Re: [PATCH] Use CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS macro some more

2016-09-28 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/22/2016 02:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! I've noticed lots of vec_safe_length (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (...)) uses in the sources, which IMHO are less readable than the much more often used CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (...) macro that does the same thing. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-

Re: [PATCH] Use CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS macro some more

2016-09-23 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 09/22/2016 10:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I've noticed lots of vec_safe_length (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (...)) uses in the sources, which IMHO are less readable than the much more often used CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (...) macro that does the same thing. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux

Re: [PATCH] Use CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS macro some more

2016-09-22 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I've noticed lots of vec_safe_length (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (...)) uses > in the sources, which IMHO are less readable than the much more often > used CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (...) macro that does the same thing. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux