Re: [PATCH] Tree unroll - Relaxing code size increase with O2

2013-11-21 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > Would it be sufficient to > > 1) get rid of the 'may_increase_size' parameter' in all the unroll > interfaces (basically make it true for O2); and > 2) set MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS parameter to be a smaller value for > O2? -- this make

Re: [PATCH] Tree unroll - Relaxing code size increase with O2

2013-11-20 Thread Xinliang David Li
Would it be sufficient to 1) get rid of the 'may_increase_size' parameter' in all the unroll interfaces (basically make it true for O2); and 2) set MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS parameter to be a smaller value for O2? -- this makes O2 and O3's complete unroll behave in the same way but with differen