Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> +Support for the > +
>> href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2016/09/12/deprecate-pcommit-instruction";>deprecated
>> +pcommit instruction has been removed.
> Could you please add the same statement for gcc-7 changes?
2017-02-25 18:10 GMT+01:00 Gerald Pfeifer :
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
But how to update changes for upcoming GCC 6.3 (and future GCC 5.5)?
>>> There are corresponding documents at [1] and [2], please add a "GCC
>>> 6.3" or "GCC 5.5" entry with "Target Specific Changes" at
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> And here is what I applied for GCC 5.
Except that I fixed some things, but failed to remove the duplicate id.
Applied as a follow-up.
Gerald
Index: gcc-5/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Below is what I just applied.
And here is what I applied for GCC 5.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.143
diff -u
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>> But how to update changes for upcoming GCC 6.3 (and future GCC 5.5)?
>> There are corresponding documents at [1] and [2], please add a "GCC
>> 6.3" or "GCC 5.5" entry with "Target Specific Changes" at the end of
>> the documents.
>>
>> [1] https://gc
2016-12-07 15:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>
>> But how to update changes for upcoming GCC 6.3 (and future GCC 5.5)?
>
> There are corresponding documents at [1] and [2], please add a "GCC
> 6.3" or "GCC 5.5" entry with "Target Specific Ch
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> But how to update changes for upcoming GCC 6.3 (and future GCC 5.5)?
There are corresponding documents at [1] and [2], please add a "GCC
6.3" or "GCC 5.5" entry with "Target Specific Changes" at the end of
the documents.
[1] https://gcc
2016-10-14 12:23 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-10-11 20:09 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-10-06 1:07 GMT+03:
> That said - why do we need to remove pcommit support on the branches at all?
I think it is better to have old branches updated because pcommit will
not be implemented in hardware.
--
WBR,
Andrew
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-10-11 20:09 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-10-06
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-10-11 20:09 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
2016-10-06 1:07 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, A
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-10-11 20:09 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-10-06 1:07 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:
2016-10-11 20:09 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-10-06 1:07 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Senk
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-10-06 1:07 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
>> -mpcommit
>> -Ta
2016-10-06 1:07 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
> -mpcommit
> -Target Report Mask(ISA_PCOMMIT) Var(ix86_isa_flags) Save
> -Suppor
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
-mpcommit
-Target Report Mask(ISA_PCOMMIT) Var(ix86_isa_flags) Save
-Support PCOMMIT instruction.
-
You sh
2016-10-05 18:06 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>>> -mpcommit
>>> -Target Report Mask(ISA_PCOMMIT) Var(ix86_isa_flags) Save
>>> -Support PCOMMIT instruction.
>>> -
>>>
>>> You should not simply delete a option that was in the released
>>> compil
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
>> (Please also provide an entry for Release Changes, since this is
>> user-facing change. Also for release branches.)
>
> What is BKM for doing that for 7.1 release? File a PR and mention it
> in ChangeLog?
No, just mention the change at [1
> (Please also provide an entry for Release Changes, since this is
> user-facing change. Also for release branches.)
What is BKM for doing that for 7.1 release? File a PR and mention it
in ChangeLog?
--
WBR,
Andrew
> -mpcommit
> -Target Report Mask(ISA_PCOMMIT) Var(ix86_isa_flags) Save
> -Support PCOMMIT instruction.
> -
>
> You should not simply delete a option that was in the released
> compiler, but a warning should be emitted instead. Please see how
> msse5 is handled in i386.opt.
Thank you, it is fixed
Hello!
> 2016-10-03 Andrew Senkevich
>
>gcc/
>
>* common/config/i386/i386-common.c (OPTION_MASK_ISA_PCOMMIT_UNSET,
>OPTION_MASK_ISA_PCOMMIT_SET): Deleted definitions.
>(ix86_handle_option): Deleted handle of OPT_mpcommit.
>* config.gcc: Deleted pcommitintrin.
21 matches
Mail list logo