On 08/23/2018 02:06 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
>> On 08/23/2018 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> This removes verify_no_unreachable_blocks and implements checking
>>> for unreachable blocks in inverted_post_order_compute by simply
>>> looking if we re
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 08/23/2018 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > This removes verify_no_unreachable_blocks and implements checking
> > for unreachable blocks in inverted_post_order_compute by simply
> > looking if we reach a block without predecessors that is not the
>
On 08/23/2018 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> This removes verify_no_unreachable_blocks and implements checking
> for unreachable blocks in inverted_post_order_compute by simply
> looking if we reach a block without predecessors that is not the
> entry block.
>
I think that doesn't detect unrea
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:18 PM Richard Biener <> wrote:
> > -/* Verify that there are no unreachable blocks in the current function. */
> > -
> > -void
> > -verify_no_unreachable_blocks (void)
> > -{
> > - find_unreachable_blocks ();
> > -
> > - ba
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:18 PM Richard Biener <> wrote:
> -/* Verify that there are no unreachable blocks in the current function. */
> -
> -void
> -verify_no_unreachable_blocks (void)
> -{
> - find_unreachable_blocks ();
> -
> - basic_block bb;
> - FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
> -gcc_assert
