> + /* Unpoison shadow memory that corresponds to a variable that was
> + is subject of use-after-return sanitization. */
was is ?
And shouldn't it be subject to instead of subject of?
Otherwise LGTM.
Jakub
On 06/30/2017 12:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:00:36PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Following crap code was added by me when I added use-after-scope.
>> Actually decl always points to LASANPC, so asan_handled_variables->contains
>> (decl)
>> is always false.
>
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:00:36PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Following crap code was added by me when I added use-after-scope.
> Actually decl always points to LASANPC, so asan_handled_variables->contains
> (decl)
> is always false.
>
> Well, originally the idea was to not clear conte
