On Wed, 06 Dec 2023 10:48:30 PST (-0800), Vineet Gupta wrote:
On 12/6/23 08:22, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
Ran the test case at 122e7b4f9d0c2d54d865272463a1d812002d0a5c where the xfail
That's the original port submission, I'm actually kind of surprised it
still builds/works at all.
Full toolchain
On 12/6/23 08:22, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> Ran the test case at 122e7b4f9d0c2d54d865272463a1d812002d0a5c where the xfail
> That's the original port submission, I'm actually kind of surprised it
> still builds/works at all.
Full toolchain build would have been a stretch (matching pairing
binutil
On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 16:39:06 PST (-0800), e...@rivosinc.com wrote:
Ran the test case at 122e7b4f9d0c2d54d865272463a1d812002d0a5c where the xfail
That's the original port submission, I'm actually kind of surprised it
still builds/works at all.
was introduced. The test did pass at that hash a
