Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-05-26 Thread Feng Wang
On 2023-03-01 09:46  Feng Wang wrote: > >The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more >and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask >flag, please refer to the below case: >There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B), >b

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-03-05 Thread Feng Wang
On 2023-03-03 17:12  Feng Wang wrote: > >On 2023-03-03 16:54  jiawei wrote: >> >>The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more >>and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask >>flag, please refer to the below case: >>There are some new MASK flags for 'v'

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-03-03 Thread Feng Wang
On 2023-03-03 16:54  jiawei wrote: > >The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more >and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask >flag, please refer to the below case: >There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B), >but

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-03-03 Thread jiawei
> The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more> and > more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask> flag, please > refer to the below case:> There are some new MASK flags for 'v' > extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B),> but these MASK flags can't stor

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-03-03 Thread jiawei
The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask flag, please refer to the below case: There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B), but these MASK flags can't store into x_target