Causes an ICE on ia64.
spawn /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20131128/Build/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20131128/Build/gcc/
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20131128/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-1.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -flto -ffat-lto-objects
-ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-co
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:08:41AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The expr.c hunk is also ok independently of the patch.
>
> This is committed now.
>
> > Ah, here is the stuff moved from. I suppose the IPA param re-org
> > is ok for trunk separately
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:48:34PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > isn't exactly enabled by default ;)
> >
> > OK :))
> > > Anyway, all the pass needs is bodies of functions with "omp declare simd"
> > > attribute which will be defined in the current partition, for functions
> > > defined in oth
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:48:34PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > isn't exactly enabled by default ;)
>
> OK :))
> > Anyway, all the pass needs is bodies of functions with "omp declare simd"
> > attribute which will be defined in the current partition, for functions
> > defined in other partitions
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 06:15:50PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > > What's the reason you cannot defer SIMD cloning to LTRANS stage
> > > > as simple IPA pass next to IPA-PTA?
> > >
> > > Ok, deferring till after IPA-PTA was easy, just small ipa-cp.c changes
> > > (look at the attribute rather
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 06:15:50PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > What's the reason you cannot defer SIMD cloning to LTRANS stage
> > > as simple IPA pass next to IPA-PTA?
> >
> > Ok, deferring till after IPA-PTA was easy, just small ipa-cp.c changes
> > (look at the attribute rather than simd*cl
> > What's the reason you cannot defer SIMD cloning to LTRANS stage
> > as simple IPA pass next to IPA-PTA?
>
> Ok, deferring till after IPA-PTA was easy, just small ipa-cp.c changes
> (look at the attribute rather than simd*clone* fields), passes.def and
> had to tweak ipa_add_new_function which
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:19:33PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:08:41AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > @@ -284,6 +382,12 @@ public:
> > >/* Declaration node used to be clone of. */
> > >tree former_clone_of;
> > >
> > > + /* If this is a SIMD clone, t
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:08:41AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > @@ -284,6 +382,12 @@ public:
> > >/* Declaration node used to be clone of. */
> > >tree former_clone_of;
> > >
> > > + /* If this is a SIMD clone, this points to the SIMD sp
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:08:41AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > @@ -284,6 +382,12 @@ public:
> >/* Declaration node used to be clone of. */
> >tree former_clone_of;
> >
> > + /* If this is a SIMD clone, this points to the SIMD specific
> > + information for it. */
> > + struct
10 matches
Mail list logo