On 2018-08-01 06:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:40 PM Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-07-26 01:27 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-24 09:57 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> /* Return a new assem
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:40 PM Michael Ploujnikov
wrote:
>
> On 2018-07-26 01:27 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> > On 2018-07-24 09:57 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> >> On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> /* Return a new assembler name for a clone with SUFFIX of a decl named
>
On 2018-07-26 01:27 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-07-24 09:57 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
/* Return a new assembler name for a clone with SUFFIX of a decl named
NAME. */
@@ -521,14 +521,13 @@ tree
clone_function
On 2018-07-24 09:57 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> /* Return a new assembler name for a clone with SUFFIX of a decl named
>>> NAME. */
>>> @@ -521,14 +521,13 @@ tree
>>> clone_function_name_1 (const char *name, const char *suffix)
>>
>> pass
On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-07-17 04:25 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-17 06:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>
>>>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM Michael Ploujnikov
wrote:
>
> On 2018-07-17 04:25 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> > On 2018-07-17 06:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 16 July 2018 21:38:36 CEST, Michael Ploujnikov
On 2018-07-17 04:25 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-07-17 06:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 July 2018 21:38:36 CEST, Michael Ploujnikov
>>> wrote:
Hi,
>>>
+clone_fn_ids = hash_map::create
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>
> On 16 July 2018 21:38:36 CEST, Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
>
> >+clone_fn_ids = hash_map::create_ggc
> >(1000);
>
> Isn't 1000 a bit excessive? What about 64 or thereabouts?
I'm not sure we should throw memory at
On 16 July 2018 21:38:36 CEST, Michael Ploujnikov
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>+clone_fn_ids = hash_map::create_ggc
>(1000);
Isn't 1000 a bit excessive? What about 64 or thereabouts?
thanks,
