Re: [PATCH] Less restrictive regex in const-uniq-1.c

2012-11-06 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:54 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> The regex in const-uniq-1.c assumes ELF label format, which does not >> match AIX XCOFF. The following patch broadens the regex so that it >> also correctly matches on AIX. >> >>

Re: [PATCH] Less restrictive regex in const-uniq-1.c

2012-11-06 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:54 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > The regex in const-uniq-1.c assumes ELF label format, which does not > match AIX XCOFF. The following patch broadens the regex so that it > also correctly matches on AIX. > > * const-uniq-1.c: Expand regex to match AIX XCOFF labels.