On Mar 30, 2023, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> How about this, does this seem useful?
> I like it - helpful and easy to understand. :-)
'k, I'm putting it in, thanks
On Mar 30, 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> IMO, yes - in fact, the libstdc++ manual e
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> How about this, does this seem useful?
I like it - helpful and easy to understand. :-)
Gerald
Hi Alexandre,
Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches writes:
> Hello, Gerald,
>
> On Feb 11, 2023, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Introduce -nostdlib++ option
>>>
>>> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
>>>
Hello, Gerald,
On Feb 11, 2023, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Introduce -nostdlib++ option
>>
>> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
>> is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc+
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Introduce -nostdlib++ option
>
> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
> is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc++
> without also dropping libc and any other libraries that the
On 9/16/22 07:52, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/24/22 01:23, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Here's the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a
cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
Introduce -nostdlib++ option
Uhh, I went
On 9/16/22 07:52, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/24/22 01:23, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Here's the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a
cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
Introduce -nostdlib++ option
Uhh, I went
On 6/24/22 01:23, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Here's the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a
cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
Introduce -nostdlib++ option
Uhh, I went ahead and installed this. The earlier
On Jun 23, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Here's the patch. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a
> cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
> Introduce -nostdlib++ option
Uhh, I went ahead and installed this. The earlier patch was approved if
nobody objected, and so, having ove
On Jun 22, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Yeah, I suppose that makes sense, it's beneficial for users to avoid the
> cognitive overload of dealing with equivalent options with different
> spellings. I'll swallow my dislike for the spelling and change the
> patch to use -nostdlib++.
Here's the p
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 4:29 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2022, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> > It makes some sense to have the option named -nostdlib++ if a target
> > might add multiple libs (and/or make other changes) for linking C++.
>
> if it was nostdlibc++, I'd agree. lib++ is not so
On Jun 22, 2022, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> It makes some sense to have the option named -nostdlib++ if a target
> might add multiple libs (and/or make other changes) for linking C++.
if it was nostdlibc++, I'd agree. lib++ is not something that brings
C++ to (my) mind.
> (so, fo example, if libstdc
> On 22 Jun 2022, at 01:36, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2022, Fangrui Song wrote:
>
>> Is this similar to clang -nostdlib++ ?
>> When libstdc++ is selected, clang -nostdlib++ removes -lstdc++.
>
> Sounds like they're the same indeed, but the clang option you men
On Jun 21, 2022, Fangrui Song wrote:
> Is this similar to clang -nostdlib++ ?
> When libstdc++ is selected, clang -nostdlib++ removes -lstdc++.
Sounds like they're the same indeed, but the clang option you mention
makes little sense to me, so I'd rather to introduce the one that does.
If someone
On 2022-06-21, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:43 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:43 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:43 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
> > is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libs
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
> is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc++
> without also dropping libc and any other libraries that the target
> implicit
18 matches
Mail list logo
