> The new test fails on x86_64 Ubuntu 12.04 native build:
Yes, this should be fixed once kcc's patches get into trunk
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00756.html). Current
asan_interface.h is indeed C++-only.
-Y
On May 14, 2014, at 4:13 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Asan and Tsan allow sanitized applications to tweak runtime behavior via API
> defined in headers in libsanitizer/include/sanitizer. This patch adds
> installation code for these headers and a small test.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested
On 05/14/2014 10:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Ok.
Thanks, submitted in r210413.
-Y
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 05/14/2014 10:29 AM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, I'd say we should only install headers for components that are
>>> supported by target platform.
>>
>> maybe yes. It just complicates the patch somewhat.
>
>
> True... But this
On 05/14/2014 10:29 AM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
Well, I'd say we should only install headers for components that are
supported by target platform.
maybe yes. It just complicates the patch somewhat.
True... But this seems to be the preferred way in GCC (other runtimes
also list headers ex
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:13:07PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> Asan and Tsan allow sanitized applications to tweak runtime behavior
> via API defined in headers in libsanitizer/include/sanitizer. This
> patch adds installation code for these headers and a small test.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 05/14/2014 08:54 AM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> Shouldn't we just install the entire include/sanitizer directory?
>
> Well, I'd say we should only install headers for components that are
> supported by target platform.
maybe yes. It jus
On 05/14/2014 08:54 AM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> Shouldn't we just install the entire include/sanitizer directory?
Well, I'd say we should only install headers for components that are
supported by target platform.
-Y
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x64.
Forgot to mention: the newly added test currently fails for C because of
C++-isms in asan_interface.h but this should be fixed with next merge
from LLVM.
-Y
Shouldn't we just install the entire include/sanitizer directory?
(And thanks for doing this!!)
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Asan and Tsan allow sanitized applications to tweak runtime behavior via API
> defined in headers in libsanitizer/include/sanitizer. This
10 matches
Mail list logo