I haven't yet but I will try and sort it out tomorrow.
If we're replacing the current method with one that takes a size
parameter when _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI is defined, is this going to
cause any issues with ABI compatibility? If not, then I agree that we
should go with the #if version.
On 10 Oc
On 09/10/16 16:23 +0100, Elliot Goodrich wrote:
Hi,
If we unroll the loop so that we iterate both forwards and backwards,
we can take advantage of memory-level parallelism when chasing
pointers. This means that reverse takes 35% less time when nodes are
randomly scattered in memory and about the
