Re: [PATCH] ICF&SRA: Make ICF and SRA agree on padding

2024-04-08 Thread Martin Jambor
Hello, On Sun, Apr 07 2024, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: >> The patch has been approved by Honza in Bugzilla. (I hope.  He did write >> it looked reasonable.)  Together with the patch for PR 113907, it has >> passed bootstrap, LTO bootstrap and LTO pro

Re: [PATCH] ICF&SRA: Make ICF and SRA agree on padding

2024-04-07 Thread Xi Ruoyao
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > +/* Given two types in an assignment, return true either if any one cannot be > +   totally scalarized or if they have padding (i.e. not copied bits)  */ > + > +bool > +sra_total_scalarization_would_copy_same_data_p (tree t1, tree t2) > +{ >

Re: [PATCH] ICF&SRA: Make ICF and SRA agree on padding

2024-04-07 Thread Xi Ruoyao
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > The patch has been approved by Honza in Bugzilla. (I hope.  He did write > it looked reasonable.)  Together with the patch for PR 113907, it has > passed bootstrap, LTO bootstrap and LTO profiledbootstrap and testing on > x86_64-linux and bo