On 11/12/13 2:03 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 11-11-13 14:17, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/11/13 10:50, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64.
>
> OK for trunk?
>>>
On 11-11-13 14:17, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 11/11/13 10:50, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Comments inline
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-tail-merge.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-tai
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 11/11/13 10:50, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64.
> >>
> >> OK for trunk?
> >
> > Comments inline
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-tail-merge.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-tail-merge
On 11/11/13 10:50, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64.
>>
>> OK for trunk?
>
> Comments inline
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-tail-merge.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-tail-merge.c
> index 98b5882..43516a7 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-tail-m
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Consider the test-case test.c:
> ...
> int z;
> int x;
>
> void
> f (int c, int d)
> {
> if (c)
> z = 5;
> else
> {
> if (d)
> x = 4;
> z = 5;
> }
> }
> ...
>
> Atm, we don't tail-merge the 'z = 5' blocks,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 05:30:00PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
>Richard,
>
>Consider the test-case test.c:
>...
>int z;
>int x;
>
>void
>f (int c, int d)
>{
> if (c)
>z = 5;
> else
>{
> if (d)
> x = 4;
> z = 5;
>}
>}
>...
>
>Atm, we don't tail-merge the 'z = 5' blocks,
