Re: [PATCH] HIGH part of symbol ref is invalid for constant pool

"Kewen.Lin" writes: > Hi Jeff, > > Thanks for the patch, one question is inlined below. > > on 2022/7/4 14:58, Jiufu Guo wrote: >> The high part of the symbol address is invalid for the constant pool. In >> function rs6000_cannot_force_const_mem, we already return true for >> "HIGH with UNSPEC" r

Re: [PATCH] HIGH part of symbol ref is invalid for constant pool

Hi Jeff, Thanks for the patch, one question is inlined below. on 2022/7/4 14:58, Jiufu Guo wrote: > The high part of the symbol address is invalid for the constant pool. In > function rs6000_cannot_force_const_mem, we already return true for > "HIGH with UNSPEC" rtx. During debug GCC, I found tha