On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 12:29:31PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:20:29AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > There are many more
> > test cases that forget the "inline" and filter the warning with
> > "-Wno-attributes". I'll post an add-on patch later after testing
> > it.
>
On 06/01/2015 10:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> always_inline attribute is meaningful only for functions declared
> inline, and the compiler even warns about this, so it is unclear
> to me why the tests are attempting to use that.
>
> 2015-06-01 Jakub Jelinek
>
> * gcc.target/s39
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:20:29AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > always_inline attribute is meaningful only for functions declared
> > inline, and the compiler even warns about this, so it is unclear
> > to me why the tests are attem
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> always_inline attribute is meaningful only for functions declared
> inline, and the compiler even warns about this, so it is unclear
> to me why the tests are attempting to use that.
Since Gcc emits just a cryptic warning and not an
