On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 22:10:00 +0100
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Kevin, did you have some gdb testcases you were trying for the r253335
> change? Can you try those with added another e.g. parallel around it (say
> #pragma omp parallel if (0) or num_threads (1), so that it doesn't spawn too
> many child
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 05:51:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On November 17, 2018 4:14:58 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
> > wrote:
> > >On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:31:32AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >> On November 16, 2018 10:10:00 PM GMT+01:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 05:51:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On November 17, 2018 4:14:58 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
> wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:31:32AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On November 16, 2018 10:10:00 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
> >> wrote: Can you add a comment
On November 17, 2018 4:14:58 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:31:32AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On November 16, 2018 10:10:00 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
>> wrote: Can you add a comment why doing it
>differently
>> for this case is necessary or do it the same
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:31:32AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On November 16, 2018 10:10:00 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
> wrote: Can you add a comment why doing it differently
> for this case is necessary or do it the same way in all cases?
Do you mean in omp-expand.c or dwarf2out.c? I belie
On November 16, 2018 10:10:00 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As mentioned in the PR, the PR78363 changes were done too early, as
>some of
>the BLOCKs are moved to the outlined function, it is undesirable to
>generate
>DW_TAG_lexical_block DIEs for them in a different function from whi
