all. We will have a look into it.
Regards
Ganesh
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:rguent...@suse.de]
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:08 PM
To: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
Cc: Uros Bizjak; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix bdverN vector cost of
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote:
> > I have added a person from AMD to comment on the decision.
> > Otherwise, the patch looks OK, but please wait a couple of days for
> > possible comments.
>
> Thank you Uros!
> I am checking the changes with few tests and benchmarking them.
> I have added a person from AMD to comment on the decision.
> Otherwise, the patch looks OK, but please wait a couple of days for possible
> comments.
Thank you Uros!
I am checking the changes with few tests and benchmarking them.
Please wait for a couple of days.
-Ganesh
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> They are suspiciously low (compared to say scalar_stmt_cost) and with
> them and the fix for the vectorizer cost model to properly account
> scalar stmt costs (and thus correctly dealing with odd costs as bdverN
> have) we regress 252.eon
