> On Apr 26, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> So pre ISO C++ gave the second decl the same scope as the first one?
> that's... exciting ;)
So, all the code in the world that is meant to be ported up the an ANSI
standard for C++ has already been so ported, we could remove all notion th
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:03:03AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 07:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >I've noticed a warning during bootstrap:
> >../../gcc/reorg.c: In function ‘void try_merge_delay_insns(rtx_insn*,
> >rtx_insn*)’:
> >../../gcc/reorg.c:1431:12: warning: name looku
On 04/26/2016 05:41 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:13:32PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 04/26/2016 03:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
^
../../gcc/reorg.c:1413:25: warning: matches this ‘i’ under old rules
for (unsigned int i = len - 1; i < len; i--)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:13:32PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 03:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >^
> >../../gcc/reorg.c:1413:25: warning: matches this ‘i’ under old rules
> >for (unsigned int i = len - 1; i < len; i--)
> > ^
>
> Oh, and al
On 04/26/2016 07:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
I've noticed a warning during bootstrap:
../../gcc/reorg.c: In function ‘void try_merge_delay_insns(rtx_insn*,
rtx_insn*)’:
../../gcc/reorg.c:1431:12: warning: name lookup of ‘i’ changed
for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (PATTERN (insn), 0); i++)
On 04/26/2016 03:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
^
../../gcc/reorg.c:1413:25: warning: matches this ‘i’ under old rules
for (unsigned int i = len - 1; i < len; i--)
^
Oh, and also - I flagged this while reviewing other parts of Trevor's
changes, this pat
On 04/26/2016 03:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
It is not fatal, but still ugly. The problem is that the function has
int i;
...
for (i = 0; ...)
...
for (unsigned int i = ... )
...
for (i = 0; ...)
This patch just declares the var in the only affected loop, so that the warning
is not e
