On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:20:20AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> When "trap on unaligned" is activated, some program should not trap in
>> different way due to compiler transformations. The optimized and
>> unoptimized code should run (and tra
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:20:20AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> When "trap on unaligned" is activated, some program should not trap in
> different way due to compiler transformations. The optimized and
> unoptimized code should run (and trap) in the same way.
Ok.
Note, seems I have missed a i386/s
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> As discussed in the PR, combiner can combine e.g. unaligned integral
> load (e.g. TImode) together with some SSE instruction that requires aligned
> load, but doesn't actually check it. For AVX, most of the instructions
> actually allow una
On 12/02/13 15:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As discussed in the PR, combiner can combine e.g. unaligned integral
load (e.g. TImode) together with some SSE instruction that requires aligned
load, but doesn't actually check it. For AVX, most of the instructions
actually allow unaligned operands,
