On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Please add a comment explaining why flag_generate_lto matters there. OK with
> that change.
Committed as follows.
Thanks,
Richard.
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/53471
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_finish): If generating LTO
Please add a comment explaining why flag_generate_lto matters there. OK
with that change.
Jason
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> > Or use your first patch, and decide that we don't care about the linkage
> > name
> > of unreachable types. What types are affected by this, anyway?
So like the following.
Bootstrapped and tested on x
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 05:22 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > The comment mentions PCH in connection with deferred seting of
> > > DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME; off the top of my head it occurs to me that that
> > > might
On 06/01/2012 05:22 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
The comment mentions PCH in connection with deferred seting of
DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME; off the top of my head it occurs to me that that might be
connected with anonymous unions, which need to have different l
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> The comment mentions PCH in connection with deferred seting of
> DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME; off the top of my head it occurs to me that that might be
> connected with anonymous unions, which need to have different linkage names in
> different translation units
The comment mentions PCH in connection with deferred seting of
DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME; off the top of my head it occurs to me that that
might be connected with anonymous unions, which need to have different
linkage names in different translation units.
Jason
