On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 11:03 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:30 PM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Richi, thank you for the detailed review!
> >
> > I'll plan to move the power-series expansion into the existing IL walk
> > during pass_cse_sincos. As part of this, I'll
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:30 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> Richi, thank you for the detailed review!
>
> I'll plan to move the power-series expansion into the existing IL walk
> during pass_cse_sincos. As part of this, I'll move
> tree_expand_builtin_powi and its subfunctions from builtins.c in
Richi, thank you for the detailed review!
I'll plan to move the power-series expansion into the existing IL walk
during pass_cse_sincos. As part of this, I'll move
tree_expand_builtin_powi and its subfunctions from builtins.c into
tree-ssa-math-opts.c. I'll submit this as a separate patch.
I wi
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 11:26 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Nathan Froyd
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
This patch addresses PR46728, which notes that pow and powi need to be
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 10:52 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 17:26 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
-- snip --
> >
> > The position of the pass is odd - why did you place it there? I would
> > have placed it alongside pass_cse_sincos and pass_optimize_bswap.
>
> That was
On 05/13/2011 11:26 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Nathan Froyd
> wrote:
>> On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
>>> This patch addresses PR46728, which notes that pow and powi need to be
>>> lowered in tree phases to restore lost FMA opportunities and
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 17:26 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Nathan Froyd
> wrote:
> > On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> >> This patch addresses PR46728, which notes that pow and powi need to be
> >> lowered in tree phases to restore lost FMA op
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
>> This patch addresses PR46728, which notes that pow and powi need to be
>> lowered in tree phases to restore lost FMA opportunities and expose
>> vectorization opportunities.
>>
>> +struct gi
On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> This patch addresses PR46728, which notes that pow and powi need to be
> lowered in tree phases to restore lost FMA opportunities and expose
> vectorization opportunities.
>
> +struct gimple_opt_pass pass_lower_pow =
> +{
> + {
> + GIMPLE_PASS,
>
