On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:30 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Following patch renames an enum values so that they do not clash with a
>>> MinGW reserved keyword.
>>
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Following patch renames an enum values so that they do not clash with a
>> MinGW reserved keyword.
>
> Reserved keyword as in a #define? Thus simply #undef it in syst
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Following patch renames an enum values so that they do not clash with a MinGW
> reserved keyword.
Reserved keyword as in a #define? Thus simply #undef it in system.h?
> Patch can bootstrap on MinGW and there's no regression seen
