On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 08:53:49PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > In this case there is no -fsso-struct option (what would it mean), so
> > -fno-sso-struct isn't there either (again, what would that mean).
> > The only thing that would make sense IMHO would be to allow
> > not just big-endian and
> In this case there is no -fsso-struct option (what would it mean), so
> -fno-sso-struct isn't there either (again, what would that mean).
> The only thing that would make sense IMHO would be to allow
> not just big-endian and little-endian, but also native, so one can
> cancel earlier -fsso-struc
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:27:09PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > Enum options should not allow negative form, otherwise the option handling
>> > ICEs on it. -fsso-struct= allows on
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:27:09PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Enum options should not allow negative form, otherwise the option handling
> > ICEs on it. -fsso-struct= allows only big-endian or little-endian,
> > -fno-sso-struct=big-endi
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Enum options should not allow negative form, otherwise the option handling
> ICEs on it. -fsso-struct= allows only big-endian or little-endian,
> -fno-sso-struct=big-endian or -fno-sso-struct=whatever makes no sense.
>
> Bootstrapped/
