> Hi.
>
> This is pre-approved patch that displays edge counts in dump files:
>
> ...
> _85 = _83 + _84;
> len_86 = SQRT (_85);
> if (_85 u>= 0.0)
> goto ; [99.00%] [count: 778568]
> else
> goto ; [1.00%] [count: 7864]
>
>[0.01%] [count: 7864]:
> sqrt (_85);
> ...
>
> That
On Jun 14 2017, Rainer Orth wrote:
> +{ dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "> \\\[\[0-9.\]+%\\\]\\
> \\\[count:\\\[^:\\]*\\\]:\n *must_not_eliminate" 127 "optimized" { target {
> ilp32 || lp64 } } } }
> +{ dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "> \\\[\[0-9.\]+%\\\]\\
> \\\[count:\\\[^:\\]*\\\]:
On 06/14/2017 08:31 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I've looked at the patch and committed following change that makes
> both tests pass. Scanning for [^:]* is weird, it would make more sense
> to scan for [^]]*, but as only [0-9INV]* can appear there, I think it
> doesn't hurt to be more precise.
Yes
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:52:10AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> both revised scan-tree-dump patterns got the quoting wrong, leading to
> attempts to run unknown procs ^\\: instead of matching [^:] ;-(
>
> This totally broke make check-gcc: the affected partial test runs
> aborted at that point, lea
Hi Paul,
> New "ERROR: (DejaGnu)" on mips64el target.
>
> my DejaGnu version is 1.5.1.
>
> 1)
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=builtin-sprintf-2.c"
> ...
> ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "^:\\" does not exist.
> The error code is TCL LOOKUP COMMAND ^:\\
> The info on the error is:
> invalid comm
New "ERROR: (DejaGnu)" on mips64el target.
my DejaGnu version is 1.5.1.
1)
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=builtin-sprintf-2.c"
...
ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "^:\\" does not exist.
The error code is TCL LOOKUP COMMAND ^:\\
The info on the error is:
invalid command name "^:\"
while execu
