Re: [PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-17 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > > On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > > This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we > > > > allo

Re: [PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we > > > allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable s

Re: [PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-16 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we > > allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for > > our GC memory allocator. > Out of curiosity (just in

Re: [PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-16 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for our GC memory allocator. Out of curiosity (just in case you hav two spare minutes) do you have any idea why th