On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > $subject, applied as obvious.
>
> I think you should do the same for the vectorizer too. I noticed that
> when testing the patch for loop splitting.
Can't see where BB_VISITED is used by
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> $subject, applied as obvious.
I think you should do the same for the vectorizer too. I noticed that
when testing the patch for loop splitting.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Richard.
>
> 2016-10-17 Richard Biener
>
> * bb-reorder.c (reo
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:26:42 +0200 (CEST), Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> --- gcc/bb-reorder.c (revision 241228)
>> +++ gcc/bb-reorder.c (working copy)
>> @@ -2355,7 +2355,10 @@ reorder_basic_blocks_simple (void)
>> To start w
Hi!
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:26:42 +0200 (CEST), Richard Biener
wrote:
> --- gcc/bb-reorder.c (revision 241228)
> +++ gcc/bb-reorder.c (working copy)
> @@ -2355,7 +2355,10 @@ reorder_basic_blocks_simple (void)
> To start with, everything points to itself, nothing is assigned yet. */
>
>
