On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:07:36PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> 2018-01-03 Martin Liska
>
> PR tree-optimization/83593
> * tree-ssa-strlen.c (strlen_check_and_optimize_stmt): Clean-up
> EH gimple statements.
> (strlen_dom_walker::before_dom_children): Call
> gimple
On 01/03/2018 01:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> If gimple_purge_dead_eh_edges returns true, you want to arrange for the
> pass to return TODO_cleanup_cfg (probably needs to use some global static
> variable to propagate that).
>
> Jakub
Hi.
Sending v2. I'm suggesting to propagate that in
s
On 01/03/2018 01:49 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> + *cleanup_eh = maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (stmt,
> + stmt);
>
> Do you mean *cleanup_eh |= ... ?
>
Yes. Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:27:01PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> /* Reading the final '\0' character. */
> tree zero = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (lhs), 0);
> gimple_set_vuse (stmt, NULL_TREE);
> gimple_assign_set
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
+ *cleanup_eh = maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (stmt,
+ stmt);
Do you mean *cleanup_eh |= ... ?
--
Marc Glisse
