Re: [PATCH] C99 testsuite readiness: -fpermissive tests

2023-11-11 Thread Sam James
Florian Weimer writes: > * Eric Gallager: > >>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20080910-1.c >>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20080910-1.c >>> index bf32775d401..911fb562790 100644 >>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20080910-1.c >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.

Re: [PATCH] C99 testsuite readiness: -fpermissive tests

2023-11-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/10/23 15:06, Florian Weimer wrote: These tests use obsolete language constructs, but they are not clearly targeting C89, either. So use -fpermissive to keep future errors as warnings. The reasons why obsolete constructs are used used vary from test to test. Some tests deliberately exe

Re: [PATCH] C99 testsuite readiness: -fpermissive tests

2023-11-11 Thread Florian Weimer
* Eric Gallager: >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20080910-1.c >> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20080910-1.c >> index bf32775d401..911fb562790 100644 >> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20080910-1.c >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20080910-1.c >> @

Re: [PATCH] C99 testsuite readiness: -fpermissive tests

2023-11-11 Thread Eric Gallager
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:06 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > These tests use obsolete language constructs, but they are not > clearly targeting C89, either. So use -fpermissive to keep > future errors as warnings. > > The reasons why obsolete constructs are used used vary from > test to test. Some