Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Ping. On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Hi, > > Just wondering if you got a chance to look at this? > > Sri > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jan Hu

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Hi, Just wondering if you got a chance to look at this? Sri On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I apologize for taking so long to get into this p

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> Hello, >> I apologize for taking so long to get into this patch. I ad busy time >> (wedding >> and teaching), should be back in regular schedule now. >> >>> Sri, can you provide exam

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hello, > I apologize for taking so long to get into this patch. I ad busy time > (wedding > and teaching), should be back in regular schedule now. > >> Sri, can you provide examples to show why putting thunks into the same >> section as the t

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Hello, I apologize for taking so long to get into this patch. I ad busy time (wedding and teaching), should be back in regular schedule now. > Sri, can you provide examples to show why putting thunks into the same > section as the target function when function reorder is on can be bad > ? C++ AB

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Sri, can you provide examples to show why putting thunks into the same section as the target function when function reorder is on can be bad ? Thanks, David On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Hi Honza, > >Could you review this patch when you find time? > > Thanks > S

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Hi Honza, Could you review this patch when you find time? Thanks Sri On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Ping. > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> Ping. >> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Sriraman Tallam >> wrote: >>> Ping. >>> >>> On

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Ping. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Ping. > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> Ping. >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Sriraman Tallam >> wrote: >>> Ping. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: Hi, >

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Ping. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Ping. > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> Ping. >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like this patch reviewed and considered for commit when >>> Stage 1

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Ping. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Ping. > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like this patch reviewed and considered for commit when >> Stage 1 is active again. >> >> Patch Description: >> >> A C++ thunk's section name i

Re: [PATCH] C++ thunk section names

Ping. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > Hi, > > I would like this patch reviewed and considered for commit when > Stage 1 is active again. > > Patch Description: > > A C++ thunk's section name is set to be the same as the original function's > section name for which the t