On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > The discovered 5 unnecessary C++ static locals with ctors prompted me to
> > look at other cases, which from looking at the optimized or non-optimized
> > code are just terrible.
> > We don't
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 08:55:02AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > While I agree with the goal to reduce the number of static constructors
> > > esp. the vNULL cases I disagree with
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 08:55:02AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > While I agree with the goal to reduce the number of static constructors
> > esp. the vNULL cases I disagree with. This is just introducing
> > undefined behavior (uninitialized object u
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 08:55:02AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> While I agree with the goal to reduce the number of static constructors
> esp. the vNULL cases I disagree with. This is just introducing
> undefined behavior (uninitialized object use), and in case we end up
> making vNULL not all-z
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The discovered 5 unnecessary C++ static locals with ctors prompted me to
> look at other cases, which from looking at the optimized or non-optimized
> code are just terrible.
> We don't need to initialize static vectors with vNULL, because that
