On 12/7/20 11:17 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 12/7/20 4:04 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/5/20 7:37 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 12/2/20 7:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/1/20 1:28 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: + tree type =
targetm.cxx.guard_mask_bit ()
+ ? TREE_TYPE (guard)
On 12/7/20 4:04 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/5/20 7:37 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 12/2/20 7:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On 12/1/20 1:28 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: + tree type =
>>> targetm.cxx.guard_mask_bit ()
+ ? TREE_TYPE (guard) : char_type_node;
+
On 12/5/20 7:37 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 12/2/20 7:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/1/20 1:28 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 11/24/20 11:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/22/20 3:05 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
this avoids the need to use -fno-threadsafe-statics on
arm-none-eabi or worki
On 12/2/20 7:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/1/20 1:28 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 11/24/20 11:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On 11/22/20 3:05 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
this avoids the need to use -fno-threadsafe-statics on
arm-none-eabi or working around that probl
On 12/1/20 1:28 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 11/24/20 11:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/22/20 3:05 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
this avoids the need to use -fno-threadsafe-statics on
arm-none-eabi or working around that problem by supplying
a dummy __sync_synchronize function which might
j
On 11/24/20 11:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/22/20 3:05 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this avoids the need to use -fno-threadsafe-statics on
>> arm-none-eabi or working around that problem by supplying
>> a dummy __sync_synchronize function which might
>> just lead to silent code fai
On 11/22/20 3:05 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
this avoids the need to use -fno-threadsafe-statics on
arm-none-eabi or working around that problem by supplying
a dummy __sync_synchronize function which might
just lead to silent code failure of the worst kind
(non-reproducable, racy) at runtime,
