On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 13:08, François Dumont wrote:
>
> On 09/08/21 1:52 pm, François Dumont wrote:
> > On 09/08/21 12:45 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:26
On 09/08/21 1:52 pm, François Dumont wrote:
On 09/08/21 12:45 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:26, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
Some newly introduced tests in
23
On 09/08/21 12:45 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:26, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
Some newly introduced tests in
23_containers/unordered_map/cons/default.cc rev
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:26, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Some newly introduced tests in
> > > 23_containers/unordered_map/cons/default.cc revealed that we ar
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:26, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> wrote:
> >
> > Some newly introduced tests in
> > 23_containers/unordered_map/cons/default.cc revealed that we are forcing
> > the allocator type to have a operator==.
>
> All alloc
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:26, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> Some newly introduced tests in
> 23_containers/unordered_map/cons/default.cc revealed that we are forcing
> the allocator type to have a operator==.
All allocators are required to have operator== so that should not be a
problem
