On 8/11/20 11:04 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Looks good to me. Perhaps it would be more systematic to add them to
the remaining propagators as well - bugs tends to pop up from time to
time related to those.
Works for me.
@Martin: Can you please add them?
Thanks,
Martin
> Hey.
>
> I'm debugging PR96482 and it would be handy for me to have a debug counter
> for the problematic transformation.
>
> Ready for master?
Looks good to me. Perhaps it would be more systematic to add them to
the remaining propagators as well - bugs tends to pop up from time to
time relat
