Re: [PATCH] 1/n Refactoring tree-vrp.c, step one introducing vr_values class

2017-11-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/09/2017 11:12 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 11/07/2017 02:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> So this is the first step in pulling apart tree-vrp.c.  As outlined in >> an earlier message the goal of this patch is just to get the vr_values >> class introduced.  I've tried (and mostly succeeded) in avoidi

Re: [PATCH] 1/n Refactoring tree-vrp.c, step one introducing vr_values class

2017-11-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/09/2017 08:24 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:03:19PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: >>> So this is the first step in pulling apart tree-vrp.c. As outlined in >>> an earlier message the goal of this patch is just to ge

Re: [PATCH] 1/n Refactoring tree-vrp.c, step one introducing vr_values class

2017-11-09 Thread Martin Sebor
On 11/07/2017 02:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote: So this is the first step in pulling apart tree-vrp.c. As outlined in an earlier message the goal of this patch is just to get the vr_values class introduced. I've tried (and mostly succeeded) in avoiding doing significant cleanups/rewrites at this point

Re: [PATCH] 1/n Refactoring tree-vrp.c, step one introducing vr_values class

2017-11-09 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:03:19PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: >> So this is the first step in pulling apart tree-vrp.c. As outlined in >> an earlier message the goal of this patch is just to get the vr_values >> class introduced. I've tried (a

Re: [PATCH] 1/n Refactoring tree-vrp.c, step one introducing vr_values class

2017-11-08 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:03:19PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > So this is the first step in pulling apart tree-vrp.c. As outlined in > an earlier message the goal of this patch is just to get the vr_values > class introduced. I've tried (and mostly succeeded) in avoiding doing > significant cleanups