OK, thanks.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:32 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> > Let's go with this. And remove the comment.
>
> > And the !processing_template_decl is also redundant, since that's
> > checked at the top of value_dependent_expression_p.
>
> I've t
On Nov 29, 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Let's go with this. And remove the comment.
> And the !processing_template_decl is also redundant, since that's
> checked at the top of value_dependent_expression_p.
I've tested this on i686- and x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok to install?
[PR86397] resolve nond
On 11/27/18 11:54 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 27, 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/22/18 6:40 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Mangling visits the base template function type, prior to template
resolution, and on such types, exception specifications may contain
unresolved noexcept expressions
On Nov 27, 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/22/18 6:40 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Mangling visits the base template function type, prior to template
>> resolution, and on such types, exception specifications may contain
>> unresolved noexcept expressions. nothrow_spec_p is called on them
>>
On 11/22/18 6:40 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Mangling visits the base template function type, prior to template
resolution, and on such types, exception specifications may contain
unresolved noexcept expressions. nothrow_spec_p is called on them
even when exception specifications are not part of
