On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> Hi,
>> As described in the bug, tree-if-conv is calling update_stmt on an
>> old stmt which might have been removed from the IR already
>> (transforming of an assignment to a call
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Hi,
> As described in the bug, tree-if-conv is calling update_stmt on an
> old stmt which might have been removed from the IR already
> (transforming of an assignment to a call in this case). This fixes
> the problem by calling update_stm