On 01/03/2012 10:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 January 2012 18:07, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> I rebuilt the library with this
>> change to gcc and ran the test suite. All passed normally.
>
> That's what I needed to know, your original mail didn't say anything
> about running the test suite.
>
On 3 January 2012 18:07, Chase Douglas wrote:
> I rebuilt the library with this
> change to gcc and ran the test suite. All passed normally.
That's what I needed to know, your original mail didn't say anything
about running the test suite.
Looking at the patch again, why have you added destructor
On 01/03/2012 09:01 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 January 2012 16:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 3 January 2012 16:23, Chase Douglas wrote:
>>> When compiling with a compiler that is conformant to the c++11 spec for PR
>>> c++/50500, std::shared_ptr must have an explicitly defined copy constr
On 3 January 2012 17:13, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 12:01 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 3 January 2012 16:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 3 January 2012 16:23, Chase Douglas wrote:
When compiling with a compiler that is conformant to the c++11
spec for PR c++/50500, std::
On 01/03/2012 12:01 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 January 2012 16:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 3 January 2012 16:23, Chase Douglas wrote:
>>> When compiling with a compiler that is conformant to the c++11
>>> spec for PR c++/50500, std::shared_ptr must have an explicitly
>>> defined copy co
On 3 January 2012 16:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 January 2012 16:23, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> When compiling with a compiler that is conformant to the c++11 spec for PR
>> c++/50500, std::shared_ptr must have an explicitly defined copy constructor.
>
> This has already been fixed in GCC 4.7, s
On 3 January 2012 16:23, Chase Douglas wrote:
> When compiling with a compiler that is conformant to the c++11 spec for PR
> c++/50500, std::shared_ptr must have an explicitly defined copy constructor.
This has already been fixed in GCC 4.7, see PR 50500
PR 51699 is another example of Clang faili
Fixing a typo when Cc'ing Matthias Klose.
---
When compiling with a compiler that is conformant to the c++11 spec for PR
c++/50500, std::shared_ptr must have an explicitly defined copy constructor.
Backported from revision 180159. The rest of the revision includes new
functionality, so only this
