On 08/09/16 16:25, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 8 September 2016 at 10:31, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
On 07/09/16 20:03, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On September 6, 2016 5:14:47 PM GMT+02:00, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Thanks, fixed all the above in my tree (will be retesting).
What about
On 8 September 2016 at 10:31, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> On 07/09/16 20:03, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On September 6, 2016 5:14:47 PM GMT+02:00, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
> Thanks, fixed all the above in my tree (will be retesting).
>
>> What about debug statements? ISTM you should sk
On 07/09/16 20:03, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On September 6, 2016 5:14:47 PM GMT+02:00, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
s/contigous/contiguous/
s/ where where/ where/
+struct merged_store_group
+{
+ HOST_WIDE_INT start;
+ HOST_WIDE_INT width;
+ unsigned char *val;
+ unsigned int ali
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:19:11AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > If you want a 64-bit store, you'd need to merge the two, and that would be
> > even more expensive. It is a matter of say:
> > movl $0x12345678, (%rsp)
> > movl $0x09abcdef, 4(%rsp)
> > vs.
> > movabsq $0x09abcdef12345
On September 6, 2016 5:14:47 PM GMT+02:00, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>Hi all,
s/contigous/contiguous/
s/ where where/ where/
+struct merged_store_group
+{
+ HOST_WIDE_INT start;
+ HOST_WIDE_INT width;
+ unsigned char *val;
+ unsigned int align;
+ auto_vec stores;
+ /* We record the first and
On 09/07/2016 10:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
If you want a 64-bit store, you'd need to merge the two, and that would be
even more expensive. It is a matter of say:
movl $0x12345678, (%rsp)
movl $0x09abcdef, 4(%rsp)
vs.
movabs
On 09/07/2016 02:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 06/09/16 16:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
The v3 of this patch addresses feedba
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> > On 06/09/16 16:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> > >>The v3 of this patch addresses feedback I received on the version posted
On 06/09/16 17:21, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 06/09/16 16:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
The v3 of this patch addresses feedback I received on the version posted at [1].
The
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> On 06/09/16 16:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>The v3 of this patch addresses feedback I received on the version posted at
> >>[1].
> >>The merged store buffer is now r
Hi Jakub,
On 06/09/16 16:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
The v3 of this patch addresses feedback I received on the version posted at [1].
The merged store buffer is now represented as a char array that we splat values
onto with
native_en
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> The v3 of this patch addresses feedback I received on the version posted at
> [1].
> The merged store buffer is now represented as a char array that we splat
> values onto with
> native_encode_expr and native_interpret_expr. This a
12 matches
Mail list logo
