Hi all, hello Tom,
On 9/8/20 8:51 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Add nvptx support to libatomic.
I have tried tried this patch together with the latest patch for/of PR97000
for tree-cfgcleanup.c on tree-cfgcleanup.c:
Now, I only see the expected failures and the compare_and_swap issue in
the testsui
Hi Tom,
On 9/9/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
And I observe the following fails – which seems
to be new and related to your patch (but I have not confirmed it by
reverting your libatomic patch).
Could you confirm that?
It is an indenpend issue; it is newish and I can reproduce
it on x86-64-
On 9/9/20 4:14 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 9/9/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 9/9/20 2:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On 9/8/20 5:05 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>>
On 9/8/20 8:51 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> PR target/96964
> * config/nvptx/nvptx.md (define_
On 9/9/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 9/9/20 2:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 9/8/20 5:05 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/8/20 8:51 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
PR target/96964
* config/nvptx/nvptx.md (define_expand "atomic_test_and_set"): New
expan
On 9/9/20 2:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 9/8/20 5:05 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
>> On 9/8/20 8:51 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> PR target/96964
>>> * config/nvptx/nvptx.md (define_expand "atomic_test_and_set"): New
>>> expansion.
>>> * sync-builtins.def (BUILT_IN_ATO
Hi Tom,
On 9/8/20 5:05 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 9/8/20 8:51 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
PR target/96964
* config/nvptx/nvptx.md (define_expand "atomic_test_and_set"): New
expansion.
* sync-builtins.def (BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_1): New builtin.
I have your patch applied on
On 9/8/20 8:51 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Add nvptx support to libatomic.
I tried it on powerpc64le-none-linux-gnu and that solves the
__sync_val_compare_and_swap_16 issue, I reported at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553070.html
However, when trying Jakub's example (se
