On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 21:40 +, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> David Malcolm writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:18:43AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > > > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of
> > > > > > queued
David Malcolm writes:
> On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:18:43AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
>> > > > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued
>> > > > jit
>> > > > changes for gcc 10?
>> > >
>> > > Is there anything like
On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:18:43AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued
> > > > jit
> > > > changes for gcc 10?
> > >
> > > Is there anything like an ABI involved? If so we shoul
On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:18:43AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued jit
> > > changes for gcc 10?
> >
> > Is there anything like an ABI involved? If so we should avoid
> > breaking it all the time. Otherwise JIT is not release critica
On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 08:26 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On February 1, 2019 10:11:12 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm dhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 08:40 +, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > Second version of the patch addressing David's comment about all-
> > > non-
> > > f
On February 1, 2019 10:11:12 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm
wrote:
>On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 08:40 +, Andrea Corallo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Second version of the patch addressing David's comment about all-non-
>> failing-tests.h
>>
>> Adds gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option to the libgccjit ABI and a
On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 08:40 +, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> Hi all,
> Second version of the patch addressing David's comment about all-non-
> failing-tests.h
>
> Adds gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option to the libgccjit ABI and a
> testcase for it.
>
> Using this interface is now possible to pass op
Hi David,
On 19/01/19 01:36, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 19:25 +, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> Hi all,
> this patch add gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option to the libgccjit ABI
> and a testcase for it.
>
> Using this interface is now possible to pass options affecting
> assembler and
On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 19:25 +, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> Hi all,
> this patch add gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option to the libgccjit ABI
> and a testcase for it.
>
> Using this interface is now possible to pass options affecting
> assembler and linker.
>
> Does not introduce any new regression
