On 08/30/2017 10:33 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>> Yes, sorry for the missing entries. Fixed and installed as r251412.
>> Hopefully fall out will be small.
>
> there's
>
> UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp104.c scan-tree-dump-times switchlower
> "switch" 1
>
> everywhere, it seems. gc
Hi Martin,
> Yes, sorry for the missing entries. Fixed and installed as r251412.
> Hopefully fall out will be small.
there's
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp104.c scan-tree-dump-times switchlower "switch" 1
everywhere, it seems. gcc.log has
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp104.c: dump file does not exist
F
On 08/29/2017 01:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 08/18/2017 12:25 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 08/18/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 10:32 AM, Richard Bie
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 12:25 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 08/18/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 08/14/2017 10:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Hmm, but the existing "lowering" pa
On 08/18/2017 12:25 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 08/14/2017 10:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Hmm, but the existing "lowering" part is called from the
switch-conversion pass. So
On 08/18/2017 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 08/14/2017 10:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> Hmm, but the existing "lowering" part is called from the
>>> switch-conversion pass. So
>>> I'm not sure a new file is good.
>>
>> Good, I'm no
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 10:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Hmm, but the existing "lowering" part is called from the
>> switch-conversion pass. So
>> I'm not sure a new file is good.
>
> Good, I'm not against having that in a single file. So new version
On 08/14/2017 10:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Hmm, but the existing "lowering" part is called from the
> switch-conversion pass. So
> I'm not sure a new file is good.
Good, I'm not against having that in a single file. So new version of the patch
does that.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redha
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 08/02/2017 01:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
>>> stmt.c that
>>> is responsible for switch
On 08/02/2017 01:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
>> stmt.c that
>> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to convert
>> the cod
On 08/03/2017 03:27 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> I think the main reason for not doing it early is the benefit is small
>> (unless it is GIMPLE optimizations triggering)
>
> Agree.
>
>> and we can't get rid of
>> switches completely because
On 08/03/2017 02:52 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
>> stmt.c that
>> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to convert
>> the cod
On 08/03/2017 03:02 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On 08/02/2017 01:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
stmt.c that
is responsible for switch expa
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> I think the main reason for not doing it early is the benefit is small
> (unless it is GIMPLE optimizations triggering)
Agree.
> and we can't get rid of
> switches completely because we eventually have to support casei RTL expansion.
> (and
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
> >> stmt.c that
> >> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
>> stmt.c that
>> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to convert
>
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
> stmt.c that
> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to convert
> the code
> to expand gswitch statements on tree level. Current
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
>> stmt.c that
>> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to convert
>>
> On 08/02/2017 01:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
> >> stmt.c that
> >> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to
> >>
On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:20 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current
> code in stmt.c that
> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to
> convert the code
> to expand gswitch statements on tree level. Curre
On 08/02/2017 01:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
>> stmt.c that
>> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to convert
>> the cod
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> After some discussions with Honza, I've decided to convert current code in
> stmt.c that
> is responsible for switch expansion. More precisely, I would like to convert
> the code
> to expand gswitch statements on tree level. Curren
22 matches
Mail list logo
