at.com; i...@airs.com; berg...@vnet.ibm.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][mid-end] Fix PR85123 incorrect copies
>
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > > I wonder if it's best to revert the original regression causing
> > > patch and look for a proper so
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 12:36
> To: Eric Botcazou
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Alan Modra ; Tamar
> Christina ; nd ;
> l...@redhat.com; i...@airs.com; berg...@vnet.ibm.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][mid-en
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I wonder if it's best to revert the original regression causing patch
> > and look for a proper solution in the GCC 9 timeframe?
>
> Probably the best course of action indeed, as changes in this area need to be
> thoroughly tested on various targets t
> I wonder if it's best to revert the original regression causing patch
> and look for a proper solution in the GCC 9 timeframe?
Probably the best course of action indeed, as changes in this area need to be
thoroughly tested on various targets to cover all the cases.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:29:06PM +0100, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c
> > index
> > 00660293f72e5441a6421a280b04c57fca2922b8..7daeb8c91d758edf0b3dc37f6927380b6f3df877
> > 100644
> > --- a/gcc/expr.c
> > +++ b/gcc/expr.c
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:29:06PM +0100, Tamar Christina wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c
> index
> 00660293f72e5441a6421a280b04c57fca2922b8..7daeb8c91d758edf0b3dc37f6927380b6f3df877
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/expr.c
> +++ b/gcc/expr.c
> @@ -2749,7 +2749,7 @@ copy_blkmode_to_reg (machine_
