> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:09 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Fix pragma
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:09 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Fix pragma
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:01:48PM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> > Why do you think fatal_error is the right thing here? Why doesn't normal
> > error
> > work? Generally, if one function contains 10 #pragma simd loops that
> > require
> > vectorization and 5 out of them aren't vectorized, it i
Hello Jakub,
Please see my responses below.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:59 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplu
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:59:02AM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> --- tree-vect-loop.c (revision 194483)
> +++ tree-vect-loop.c (working copy)
> @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@
> if (flag_enable_cilk && pragma_simd_assert_requested_p
> (loop->pragma_simd_index))
>
