On 08/09/15 09:26, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:21:08AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:09:01PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
On 04/09/15 13:32, James Greenhalgh wrote:
In that case, these should be implemented as inline assembly blocks. As it
stan
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:21:08AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:09:01PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> > On 04/09/15 13:32, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > > In that case, these should be implemented as inline assembly blocks. As it
> > > stands, the code generation for th
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:09:01PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> On 04/09/15 13:32, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > In that case, these should be implemented as inline assembly blocks. As it
> > stands, the code generation for these intrinsics will be very poor with this
> > patch applied.
> >
> > I'm
