On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:12:25AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 21/06/16 17:38, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:55:43PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>This is a rebase of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00403.html
> >>on top
Hi James,
On 21/06/16 17:38, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:55:43PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This is a rebase of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00403.html
on top of Evandro's changes.
Also, to elaborate on the original posting, the initial tuning
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:55:43PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a rebase of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00403.html
> on top of Evandro's changes.
> Also, to elaborate on the original posting, the initial tuning structure is
> based on the Cortex-A57 one but
Hi all,
This is a rebase of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00403.html
on top of Evandro's changes.
Also, to elaborate on the original posting, the initial tuning structure is
based on the Cortex-A57 one
but with the issue rate set to 2, FMA steering turned off and ADRP+LDR fusion
