On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 04:29:34PM +0200, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
> On 09/20/2017 08:08 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > As for general DWARF5 testing, I think best coverage is GDB (say guality
> > > testing with -gdwarf-5), I think GDB 8.0 should have the needed support.
> > > I'll try to install it
On 09/20/2017 08:08 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
As for general DWARF5 testing, I think best coverage is GDB (say guality
testing with -gdwarf-5), I think GDB 8.0 should have the needed support.
I'll try to install it (am only at 7.12.1 right now) and try to do some
testing.
> What about Pierre-Marie's w
On 09/20/2017 02:31 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:20:03AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Anyway, I did a quick LTO bootstrap with your patch and it seems
>> to work fine.
>>
>> Can you add a testcase verifying -gdwarf-5 works ok (properly
>> emitting a debug_line_str sectio
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:20:03AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Anyway, I did a quick LTO bootstrap with your patch and it seems
> to work fine.
>
> Can you add a testcase verifying -gdwarf-5 works ok (properly
> emitting a debug_line_str section?).
I'm afraid I can't. We don't have a command
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 05:24:14PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > These changes broke DWARF-5 support. E.g. in gcc-7 and before this change
> > there was:
Sorry for the breakage I had to manually merge conflicts in this
part quite a few times since th
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 05:24:14PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> These changes broke DWARF-5 support. E.g. in gcc-7 and before this change
> there was:
Here is a fix, make check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS=dwarf2.exp now passes again
even with !DWARF2_ASM_LINE_DEBUG_INFO compiler. Haven't tried LTO (except
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 02:21:29PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> ! /* Initialize the various sections and labels for dwarf output. */
>
> static void
> ! init_sections_and_labels (void)
...
These changes broke DWARF-5 support. E.g. in gcc-7 and before this change
there was:
> ! if (!dw
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 22/08/17 11:17, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> >> on aarch64_be-none-elf i see
> >>
> >> PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 (test for excess errors)
> >> PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2
On 22/08/17 11:17, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> on aarch64_be-none-elf i see
>>
>> PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 (test for excess errors)
>> PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 -O (test for excess errors)
>> PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/debu
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 04/08/17 13:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> OK if testing passes.
> >
> > Thanks. Meanwhile testing passed.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, LTO bootstrapped
> > on x86_64-unkn
On 04/08/17 13:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> OK if testing passes.
>
> Thanks. Meanwhile testing passed.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, LTO bootstrapped
> on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (both all languages). I've successfully
> bu
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 05/19/2017 06:42 AM, Rich
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 05/19/2017 06:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> > + /* ??? In some cases th
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/19/2017 06:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> > + /* ??? In some cases the C++ FE (at least) fails to
> >> > +set DECL_CONTEXT p
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> On 05/19/2017 06:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > + /* ??? In some cases the C++ FE (at least) fails to
>> > +set DECL_CONTEXT properly. Simply globalize stuff
>> > +in this
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/19/2017 06:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > + /* ??? In some cases the C++ FE (at least) fails to
> > +set DECL_CONTEXT properly. Simply globalize stuff
> > +in this case. For example
> > +__dso_handle created via iost
On 05/19/2017 06:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
+ /* ??? In some cases the C++ FE (at least) fails to
+set DECL_CONTEXT properly. Simply globalize stuff
+in this case. For example
+__dso_handle created via iostream line 74 col 25. */
+ parent = comp_unit_die ();
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This is a repost of the main part of the early LTO debug support.
> > > The only changes relative to the last post is in the dwarf2out.c
> > >
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> >
> > This is a repost of the main part of the early LTO debug support.
> > The only changes relative to the last post is in the dwarf2out.c
> > pieces due to Jasons review and Jakubs introduction of
> > D
On Fri, 19 May 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This is a repost of the main part of the early LTO debug support.
> The only changes relative to the last post is in the dwarf2out.c
> pieces due to Jasons review and Jakubs introduction of
> DW_OP_GNU_variable_value.
>
> I've also adjusted testcase
20 matches
Mail list logo
