Hi!
I'd still have preferred if that patch described (adding source code
comments) why that special handling is required, but oh well...
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:13:40 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang
wrote:
> Tested again with no regressions.
Your gomp-4_0-branch commit of this patch, r237210, forgot to cl
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:13:40PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2016/6/2 10:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to pass either a bool openacc_async flag, or
> > whole clauses, down to gfc_trans_omp_reduction_list and handle it there
> > instead of walking the list after the f
On 2016/6/2 10:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to pass either a bool openacc_async flag, or
> whole clauses, down to gfc_trans_omp_reduction_list and handle it there
> instead of walking the list after the fact?
You mean this style? (patch attached)
Tested again with no regress
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:55:05PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> fortran/
> * trans-openmp.c (gfc_trans_omp_clauses): Mark OpenACC reduction
> arguments as addressable when async clause exists.
Wouldn't it be better to pass either a bool openacc_async flag, or
whole clauses, dow
On 2016/6/1 09:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> construct_clauses.lists[OMP_LIST_REDUCTION] = NULL;
>> >oacc_clauses = gfc_trans_omp_clauses (&block, &construct_clauses,
>> >code->loc);
>> > + for (tree c = oacc_clauses; c; c = OMP_CLAUSE_CHAI
On 2016/5/31 05:51 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2016/5/31 3:28 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > On Mon, 30 May 2016 18:53:41 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> >> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:38:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> Hi, a previous patch of Cesar's has made the midd
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:32:26PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> 2016-06-01 Chung-Lin Tang
>
> c/
> * c-typeck.c (c_finish_omp_clauses): Mark OpenACC reduction
> arguments as addressable when async clause exists.
>
> cp/
> * semantics.c (finish_omp_clauses): Mark
On 2016/5/31 3:28 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 30 May 2016 18:53:41 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:38:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> Hi, a previous patch of Cesar's has made the middle-end omp-lowering
>>> automatically create and insert a tofrom
Hi!
On Mon, 30 May 2016 18:53:41 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:38:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> > Hi, a previous patch of Cesar's has made the middle-end omp-lowering
> > automatically create and insert a tofrom (i.e. present_or_copy) map for
> > parallel reductio
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:38:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Hi, a previous patch of Cesar's has made the middle-end omp-lowering
> automatically create and insert a tofrom (i.e. present_or_copy) map for
> parallel reductions. This allowed the user to not need explicit
> clauses to copy out t
10 matches
Mail list logo
