Re: [PATCH, ARM] Fix for pr65924

On 29/04/15 11:43, Yvan Roux wrote: Hi Kyrill, On 29 April 2015 at 12:06, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi Yvan, On 29/04/15 09:57, Yvan Roux wrote: Hi, here is the patch for PR65924, only tested on the original testcase so far. Can you please double check that the problem doesn't appear in the

Re: [PATCH, ARM] Fix for pr65924

Hi Kyrill, On 29 April 2015 at 12:06, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi Yvan, > > On 29/04/15 09:57, Yvan Roux wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> here is the patch for PR65924, only tested on the original testcase so >> far. > > > Can you please double check that the problem doesn't appear > in the other patterns y

Re: [PATCH, ARM] Fix for pr65924

Hi Yvan, On 29/04/15 09:57, Yvan Roux wrote: Hi, here is the patch for PR65924, only tested on the original testcase so far. Can you please double check that the problem doesn't appear in the other patterns you touched with your cleanup patch? i.e. that you don't do match_operand on an out-of